I did love using this body the most for all but the focus region challenges. Live View is the place where I think display size matters the most, but Live View magnification is noisy on Nikons making them much harder to focus than Canon’s in evening low-light scenarios. While some will appreciate its slightly larger LCD, the Canon’s have a much better result with Live View. The D600 is probably the best overall designed body of the bunch. Even turning the camera off didn’t seem to conserve the battery when the GPS was on as I had a fully charged battery nearly exhausted in 24 hours with the camera turned off while GPS was enabled. The GPS is a battery vampire, so while it might be fun to use on vacation you’d better have one fully charged battery for every three or so hours you’ll be out with your camera (with the max GPS refresh rate). The 6D’s addition of built-in GPS and WiFi will attract some, but personally I prefer the EyeFi over the Canon WiFi feature. The 6D adds the consumer SCN mode which can be handy while on vacation and adds one more top button by the LCD to make things a little more straightforward. The built-in HDR support is certainly better in the 5D Mark III (and the best of any camera I’ve used). The 5D Mark III has more features that matter and therefore more buttons and Q menu features, but overall the things you will care about the most are found in the 6D. The 6D is an awesome camera and for those who aren’t coming from cameras with the joystick multi-controller, you probably won’t be bother as much as I am about this feature. This drove me insane to the point where I wanted to toss the 6D through a window – seriously! It’s also the reason why I personally would not buy this camera, but to be fair I’m very used to my 5D Mark III and 1D X, so I don’t need this camera and this doesn’t mean that I don’t recommend it. The reason why I hate it is that there’s not a very good tactile feel like you find on the D600’s controller and when trying to change from the outermost AF point to one of the adjacent AF points frequently would change from single point AF selection to ALL AF points selected.
The absence of the picture style and rate buttons don’t bother me much, so it really boils down to the usability of the 8-way pad on the rear dial. The Canon 6D shown at the top has a 60D like design that is very similar to the 5D Mark III, but lacks the all-important joystick multi-controller (which I use heavily for changing my focus point). Up top and up front these cameras are close enough that I don’t have a strong preference or disdain for any of them. To begin, let’s just compare the backs of the cameras as that’s really where much of the most important features exist. Which camera body is the best from an ergonomics standpoint?
#5d mark iii vs 6d low light pictures professional#
What I’m sharing here are my thoughts after having these models in my hands and using them in the real world as an average consumer would use them as well as using them in the studio as a professional photographer would use them. Other sites have more scientific tables and comparisons of all of the tech data, so I’m not going to repeat that here. To answer these questions I’ll share my opinion on these cameras. Overall, I’ve been very impressed with the 6D but the inevitable questions come up:
In the first part of my Canon 6D review I shared my early thoughts and some images that I got from this camera.
0 kommentar(er)
